, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a Formerly produced ruling on exactly the same type of case.That, coupled with not enough evidence of discriminatory animus, resulted inside of a victory to the employer.Although there isn't any prohibition against referring to case

Yet, Ritter raises 3 legal arguments that could do substantial violence to federal voting rights law. His arguments would've attained no traction in Yet another era.A foolish case about a minimal paperwork error could snowball into a serious danger to your right to vote.But it surely’s a sign that the concern of no matter if to cut off voting rig